Booker v. Small & Sons
Booker v. Small & Sons
147 Ga. 566; 94 S.E. 999; 1918 Ga. LEXIS 35
Booker v. Small & Sons
Opinion of the Court
1. The evidence authorized the verdict.
2. The charge of the court to the jury that “A wife has the right to assume the debts of the husband after his death, if she so chooses,” was not erroneous. Mize v. Hawkins, 54 Ga. 501; Walker v. Walker, 139 Ga. 547 (7a), 549 (77 S. E. 795).
3. The request to review and reverse the decisions just cited has been considered and is denied.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.