Lloyd v. Redford
Cases that cite this one
17 later published cases cite this decision.
- Shadburn v. Tapp (Ga. 1953)
- Hulgan v. Gledhill (Ga. 1950)
- Barnett v. Henry (Ga. 1946)
- Salmon v. McCrary (Ga. 1944)
- Harden v. Morton (Ga. 1943)
- Kendrick v. Blackwell (Ga. 1939)
- Wardlaw v. Wardlaw (Ga. 1939)
- Wall v. Wood (Ga. 1932)
- Suber v. Black (Ga. 1929)
- Preston v. Porter Fertilizer Co. (Ga. 1929)
- Ezell v. Mobley (Ga. 1925)
- Christopher v. Mooty (Ga. 1923)
- Farr v. West (Ga. 1922)
- Allen v. Allen (Ga. 1920)
- Brogdon v. Hogan (Ga. 1941)
- Brogdon v. Hogan (Ga. 1941)
- McDermott v. Lankenau (Ga. 1930)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
“Where specific performance is sought for the enforce„ment of a parol contract for the sale of lands, such contract and the terms thereof should be established so clearly, strongly, and satisfactorily as to leave no reasonable doubt as to the agreement.” Printup v. Mitchell, 17 Ga. 558 (63 Am. D. 258); Redman v. Mays, 129 Ga. 435 (59 S. E. 212); Gordon v. Spellman, 148 Ga. 394 (96 S. E. 1006). The evidence in this case, in clearness, strength, and precision as to the contract, failed entirely to measure up to this standard, and the verdict must be set aside.
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.