Sirmans v. Rose
Sirmans v. Rose
148 Ga. 659; 97 S.E. 858; 1919 Ga. LEXIS 16
Sirmans v. Rose
Opinion of the Court
The assignments of error on the rulings upon admissibility of evidence show no error. The portions of the charge excepted to stated correct principles of law, and were properly adjusted to the pleadings and evidence. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict for the plaintiff, and there was no error in refusing a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.