Calhoun v. Arnold
Calhoun v. Arnold
149 Ga. 84; 99 S.E. 35; 1919 Ga. LEXIS 139
Calhoun v. Arnold
Dissenting Opinion
Atkinson, J.,
who dissents on the ground that the evidence demanded the verdict in favor of the transferee of the insurance policy in the contest over the fund between the administrator upon the estate of the insured and the transferee, and that the judge erred in granting a new trial.
Opinion of the Court
1. The judgment of the court overruling the demurrer was not erroneous.
2. According to the uniform ruling of this court, where the verdict is not demanded by the law and the evidence, the judgment of the trial court awarding a first new trial wjll not be distui’bed.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.