Starling v. Shaw
Cases that cite this one
6 later published cases cite this decision.
- Container Corp. of America v. Hornbuckle Farms, Inc. (Ga. 1980)
- Bonnett v. Cherokee Timber Corp. (Ga. 1966)
- Hardin v. Chambliss (Ga. 1947)
- Warthen v. Lamas (D.C. 1945)
- Hines Lumber Co. v. Lewis (Ga. 1931)
- Edmondson v. Boyd Lumber Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1925)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. Where a lease oí lands contains a clause providing that the lessee, its successors, and assigns are to have the use of the timber upon the lands leased, “ including the right to cut and remove the same from said lands within seven years from date, after which time said lease may be extended by payment of 25 cents per acre per year,” it is essential to the right of the lessee or its assigns that the option should be exercised before the expiration of the term stated in the lease or immediately upon its expiration, and that the amount stipulated as a consideration for a continuance of the lease should be paid. Shaw v. Bray, 147 Ga. 507 (94 S. E. 1008).
(a) As to construction of the words “immediately upon its expiration,” as employed above, see Hawkins v. Stoddard, 130 Ga. 727 (71 S. E. 1112).
(}>) On the trial the controlling questions for determination by the jury were whether a tender was made in accordance with the ruling above announced, and, if no tender was so made, whether the lessor waived tender by evading it. Under the evidence submitted the jury was authorized to find that such tender was not . made, and to render a verdict in behalf of the plaintiffs.
2. The refusal of a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.