Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Corbett

W. T. Oorbett as next friend of his minor son, Homer Corbett, a child six years of age, brought suit for personal injuries against the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. The plaintiff alleged that the defendant was negligent *748in leaving and placing what is known as a “velocipede car” in an open and exposed place near the depot in the town of Manor, where the public were accustomed to travel and be, and where the small children of the town were at liberty to go and where they frequently went. He charged negligence upon the part of the defendant in leaving such dangerous and attractive machine unfastened, unenclosed, and unguarded in a public place near the heart of the town, where it was easily accessible to children, and in failing to fasten it securely so that it could not be moved backward and forward; that, while it was fastened with a lock and chain, the slack in the chain permitted its forward and backward movement, with slight effort, for a distance of “from two to two and one half feet,” rendering the gearing and machinery dangerous to children who might be near by; that the car was most attractive to children, because of its similarity in principle to a bicycle or velocipede, a universal plaything of children; that it was painted in bright, attractive colors; that in trying to play with the velocipede car the boy caught his hands in the cogs and gearing, and his right hand was badly crushed and mashed and bones broken, resulting in permanent injury and loss of the thumb. The defendant company filed a general and special demurrer. The general demurrer was sustained, and upon writ of error to the Court of Apjreals this judgment was reversed. The case is in this court on certiorari from the Court of Appeals.

The facts stated in the petition, taken as true (as they must be when tested by general demurrer), fail to show negligence by the defendant; and the petition was properly dismissed by the trial court. This case is distinguishable from Mills v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co., 140 Ga. 181 (78 S. E. 816, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 1098), and Wallace v. Matthewson, 143 Ga. 236 (84 S. E. 450), where it appeared that explosives were negligently loft on the premises of the alleged tort-feasors, without protection, and not intended for immediate use. The facts differ from those stated In American Telephone &c. Co. v. Murden, 141 Ga. 208 (80 S. E. 788), and in Ferguson v. Columbus & Rome Ry., 75 Ga. 637. The rule adopted in these cases will not be extended. In S., F. & W. Ry. Co. v. Beavers, 113 Ga. 398 (39 S. E. 82, 54 L. R. A. 314), the rule applied in attractive and dangerous machine cases, in-*749dueling the Ferguson case, supra, was elaborately reviewed and discussed. See also Underwood v. W. & A. R. Co., 105 Ga. 48 (31 S. E. 123); N., C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Priest, 117 Ga. 767 (45 S. E. 35); Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Pierce, 145 Ga. 130 (88 S. E. 672). In our opinion the judgment of the Court of Appeals, reversing that of the trial court, was erroneous.

Judgment reversed.