Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921

Bell v. Brinson

Bell v. Brinson
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided June 16, 1921 · Fish
151 Ga. 583; 108 S.E. 47; 1921 Ga. LEXIS 339

Bell v. Brinson

Opinion of the Court

Fish, C. J.

On January 7, 1871, Stephen A. Corker conveyed a described tract of land to Augustus H. A. Bell “as trustee of Elizabeth C. Bell, wife of Isaiah A. Bell, and their children born or to be born.” The habendum clause was: “To have and to hold [said land] for the sole and separate use of said Elizabeth C. Bell and her said children, during her natural life and the life of the said Isaiah A. Bell, if he should survive her; and at her death, then for the use of the said Isaiah A. Bell and children *584born or to be born, and after the death of the said Elizabeth C.' and Isaiah A., then to such children as they may leave surviving them, share and share alike; . . to have and to hold the said tract or parcel of land, and all and singular the premises and appurtenances thereunto belonging, as aforsaid, and every part thereof, unto the said party of the second part as such trustee, and his successors in office.” Isaiah A. Bell and Elizabeth C. Bell had only two children born to them, Henry Bell and Fannie Bell who became Mrs. Fannie Brinson, both of whom were in life at the time of the execution of the deed. Isaiah A. Bell died in 1906; his wife, Elizabeth C., and the two children surviving him. Henry Bell died in 1911, leaving several children surviving. Mrs. Elizabeth C. Bell died in 1918. Mrs. Fannie Brinson is still in life. The children of Henry Bell brought this action against Mrs. Fannie Brinson for a partition of the land embraced in the aforementioned deed, the petitioners contending that under the terms of the deed they were entitled to a half interest in the land. The case was submitted to the judge for a decision without a jury, on an agreed statement .of facts as above set forth. The judge on the trial refused the relief prayed, and decreed the title to the land to be in Mrs. Brinson. The petitioners excepted.

The ruling was not error. In accordance with the unambiguous terms of the deed, viz., that “ after the death of the said Elizabeth O. and Isaiah A., then [the land to go] to such children as they may leave surviving them, share and share alike,” Mrs. Fannie Brinson, the only child left surviving them, is entitled to an estate in fee in all the land to the exclusion of the children of her brother, Henry, who died after the death of his father, Isaiah, but prior to the death of his mother, Elizabeth. Luquire v. Lee, 121 Ga. 624 (49 S. E. 834).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.