Bell v. Brinson
Cases that cite this one
1 later published case cites this decision.
- Acree v. Ray (Ga. 1937)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On January 7, 1871, Stephen A. Corker conveyed a described tract of land to Augustus H. A. Bell “as trustee of Elizabeth C. Bell, wife of Isaiah A. Bell, and their children born or to be born.” The habendum clause was: “To have and to hold [said land] for the sole and separate use of said Elizabeth C. Bell and her said children, during her natural life and the life of the said Isaiah A. Bell, if he should survive her; and at her death, then for the use of the said Isaiah A. Bell and children
The ruling was not error. In accordance with the unambiguous terms of the deed, viz., that “ after the death of the said Elizabeth O. and Isaiah A., then [the land to go] to such children as they may leave surviving them, share and share alike,” Mrs. Fannie Brinson, the only child left surviving them, is entitled to an estate in fee in all the land to the exclusion of the children of her brother, Henry, who died after the death of his father, Isaiah, but prior to the death of his mother, Elizabeth. Luquire v. Lee, 121 Ga. 624 (49 S. E. 834).
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.