Langston v. State
Cases that cite this one
29 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Dumas v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1999)
- Waldrop v. State (Ga. 1965)
- Cook v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
- Craig v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
- Mincey v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1971)
- Edwards v. State (Ga. 1970)
- Brown v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1967)
- Hicks v. State (Ga. 1961)
- Wilkins v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1958)
- Winford v. State (Ga. 1957)
- White v. State (Ga. 1948)
- Mack v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1944)
- Sconyers v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1942)
- Enzor v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1940)
- Aycock v. State (Ga. 1939)
- Bonner v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1939)
- Lankford v. Holton (Ga. 1938)
- Fluker v. State (Ga. 1937)
- Douglas v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1935)
- Whaley v. State (Ga. 1933)
- Austin v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1933)
- Whitman v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1929)
- Jolly v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1928)
- Morris v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1927)
- Gray v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1925)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff in error, Henry Langston Jr., and one John Henry Brady were jointly indicted for the murder of one Henry Moody. The plaintiff in error was put on trial, and-the jury returned a verdict of guilty. A motion for new trial was overruled, and the accused excepted.
The rulings made in the headnotes require no elaboration. They involve no new proposition of law; on the contrarjq the principles there laid down have been frequently stated and discussed in decisions made by this court, and they are controlling upon the questions raised by the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.