Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925

Disharoon v. Eskew

Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided March 11, 1925 · Hill

160 Ga. 102; 127 S.E. 271; 1925 Ga. LEXIS 93

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Fulford (Ga. Ct. App. 1925)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.

The petition as amended is not subject to demurrer on the ground that (a) it is duplicitous; or that (b) the agent alleged to have perpetrated the fraud upon plaintiff was “a mere special agent,” or that (e) the allegations of the petition are not sufficient to support the charge of fraud. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition. See, as to declarations of a “special agent,” Williams v. Kelsey, 6 Ga. 365, 373. As to allegations of fraud in shortage of land, Leyden v. Hickman, 75 Ga. 684; Seymore v. Rice, 94 Ga. 183 (21 S. E. 293). Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Paul Donehoo, for plaintiff in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.