Cady v. Cady
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Pierce v. Haygood (Ga. 1957)
- First National Bank v. Brown (Ga. Ct. App. 1952)
- Beasley v. Georgia Power Co. (Ga. 1950)
- Crumley v. Hall (Ga. 1947)
- Edge v. State (Ga. 1945)
- MacNeill v. Maddox (Ga. 1942)
- Jones v. Pierce (Ga. Ct. App. 1941)
- Borden v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad (Ga. Ct. App. 1939)
- Calhoun v. Southern States Naval Stores Co. (Ga. 1937)
- Howard v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1935)
- Jordan v. Duckett (Ga. 1934)
- Lancaster v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
- Yarbrough v. Taylor (Ga. Ct. App. 1932)
- Bell v. Stephens (Ga. 1931)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
1. To give this court jurisdiction, the judge’s certificate to the bill of exceptions must state that it is true; and for lack of such certification the bill of exceptions will be dismissed. Lawrence v. Monticello, 65 Ga. 298; Parmelee v. Savannah &c. Ry., 72 Ga. 216; American Freehold &c. Co. v. Candler, 80 Ga. 366 (10 S. E. 111); Cade v. DuBose, 125 Ga. 832 (54 S. E. 697); Binyard v. State, 126 Ga. 635 (55 S. E. 498); Grant v. Derrick, 130 Ga. 43 (60 S. E. 157); Prater v. Prater, 140 Ga. 326 (78 S. E. 1008); Houston v. Postell, 141 Ga. 792 (82 S. E. 148); Cartledge v. Ashford, 148 Ga. 589 (97 S. E. 521); Bugg v. Hughs, 151 Ga. 599 (107 S. E. 860); Rountree v. Gibbs, 156 Ga. 170 (118 S. E. 654).
2. This is not such a “want of technical conformity to the statutes or rules regulating the practice in carrying eases to” this court as comes within the scope of the act of Dec. IS, 1893 (Acts 1893, p. 52), now embodied in the Civil Code (1910), § 6147; and this statute will not prevent the
Writ of error dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.