Eubanks v. Griffin Investment Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Eubanks v. Griffin Investment Co., 162 Ga. 717 (Ga. 1926)
134 S.E. 760; 1926 Ga. LEXIS 267
Atkinson

Eubanks v. Griffin Investment Co.

Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, J.

1. To á final judgment rendered by the court passing upon questions both of law and fact, by consent without the intervention of a jury, an assignment of error in the bill of exceptions, immediately following a copy of the judgment, which states that the defendant “contends that said judgment is error,” fails to specify any error and can not be considered. Marshall v. English-American Loan &c. Co., 127 Ga. 376 (2) (56 S. E. 449); Peavy v. Atkinson, 108 Ga. 167 (33 S. E. 956) ; Horkan v. Moultrie, 145 Ga. 588 (89 S. E. 681).

*718No. 5180. September 18, 1926. Scolt & HornbucMe and O. G. Reynolds, for plaintiff in error. McElrecuth & Scolt, contra.

2. There being no sufficient assignment of error, the writ of error is dismissed. Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Eubanks v. Griffin Investment Company
Cited By
4 cases
Status
Published