Hattaway v. Dickens
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision.
- Clarke v. Cotton (Ga. 1994)
- Baldwin v. State (Ga. 1994)
- Clarke v. Cotton (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)
- Wiggins v. Lord (Ga. Ct. App. 1953)
- Salmon v. McCrary (Ga. 1944)
- Brogdon v. Hogan (Ga. 1941)
- Brogdon v. Hogan (Ga. 1941)
- Wardlaw v. Wardlaw (Ga. 1939)
- Gainesville Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Stewart (Ga. Ct. App. 1935)
- Wright v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1934)
- Brittain Bros. v. Davis (Ga. 1931)
- Stanfield v. Dover (Ga. 1928)
- Delagi v. Delagi (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York 1970)
- Rea v. Pursley (Ga. 1930)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The chancellor may direct the jury to find a special verdict in an equity case, and to this end may propound to them proper questions to be answered; but such questions should present the issues involved clearly and fully to the jury so that the verdict shall unmistakably cover such issues. Lake v. Hardee, 57 Ga. 459; Brown v. Watters, 61 Ga. 23, 24. The questions propounded by the court in this case presented the issues involved with sufficient clearness and fnlMess.
Headnotes other than the first do not require elaboration.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.