Cone v. Wall
Cone v. Wall
164 Ga. 550; 139 S.E. 2; 1927 Ga. LEXIS 222
Cone v. Wall
Opinion of the Court
There is no substantial error in the charge of the court complained of. The verdict is supported by the evidence, and the judge did not err in overruling the motion for new trial.
Appeal and Error, 4 O. J. p. 852, n. 56; p. 1130, n. 63.
Ejectment, 19 C. J. p. 1178, n. 30.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.