Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927

Redwine v. Carr & Co.

Redwine v. Carr & Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided July 30, 1927 · Hill
164 Ga. 592; 139 S.E. 1; 1927 Ga. LEXIS 233

Redwine v. Carr & Co.

Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.

1. The petition set out a cause of action, and the court erred in sustaining the general demurrer. Kirkpatrick v. Holland, 148 Ga. 708.

2. It does not appear from the face of the petition that the plaintiff was . . guilty of such laches as that he was barred of recovery.

Judgment reversed on the main bill of exceptions, and affirmed on the cross-bill.

Injunctions, 32 C. J. p. 70, n. 47; p. 87, n. 7; p. 319, n. 31; p. 341, n. 3.

All the Justices concur. Hewlett & Dennis and E. W. Fountain, for plaintiff. Underwood & Haas and E. 8myth Gambrell, for defendants.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.