Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931

Ragsdale v. Turner

Ragsdale v. Turner
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided January 24, 1931 · Cukiajm
171 Ga. 840; 156 S.E. 671; 1931 Ga. LEXIS 477

Ragsdale v. Turner

Opinion of the Court

Pek Cukiajm.

1. Under the pleadings and the evidence, which is conflicting, the jury was authorized to And a verdict for the defendant, as they did; and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

2. None of the special assignments of error in the amendment to the motion for new trial are urged in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, and are treated as abandoned.

3. The trial judge did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concitr.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.