Leveritt v. McCurdy
Leveritt v. McCurdy
172 Ga. 107; 157 S.E. 293; 1931 Ga. LEXIS 33
Leveritt v. McCurdy
Opinion of the Court
On the facts of this ease the judge did not err in refusing to rescind his former order, and to require the receiver to pay into court the amount he had paid out under said order, and to grant authority to sue the receiver and his bondsman for such amount.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.