Roberts v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Georgia
Roberts v. Roberts, 176 Ga. 672 (Ga. 1933)
168 S.E. 867; 1933 Ga. LEXIS 249
Atkinson

Roberts v. Roberts

Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, J.

β€œThe writ of ne exeat issues to restrain a person from leaving the jurisdiction of the State; and where the principal in a ne exeat bond appears and defends the suit against him for divorce and alimony, and is within the jurisdiction of the court when the final judgment is rendered against him, subject to the processes of the court, such writ becomes functus officio, and upon motion the court should declare the bond canceled and the sureties therein discharged.” May v. May, 146 Ga. 521 (91 S. E. 687); Lomax v. Lomax, 176 Ga. 605.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. W. H. Harris and George B. Culpepper Jr., for plaintiff. F. Holmes J ohnson, for defendant.

Reference

Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published