Lott v. Union Banking Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Lott v. Union Banking Co., 176 Ga. 753 (Ga. 1933)
168 S.E. 867; 1933 Ga. LEXIS 280
Gilbert

Lott v. Union Banking Co.

Opinion of the Court

Gilbert, J.

Under authority of Reviere v. Chambliss, 120 Ga. 714 (48 S. E. 122), the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer and dismissing the petition. And see Western & Atlantic R. Co. v. Union Investment Co., 128 Co. 74 (57 S. E. 100) ; Bank of Hamilton v. Williams, 146 Ga. 96 (90 S. E. 718). This case differs in its facts from Salzburger Bank v. Standard Oil Co., 173 Co. 722 (161 S. E. 584).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Sapp & Pames, for plaintiff. Kelley & Dickerson, for defendant.

Reference

Full Case Name
Lott v. Union Banking Company
Status
Published