Supreme Court of Georgia, 1934

Brown v. Tom Huston Corp.

Brown v. Tom Huston Corp.
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided August 9, 1934 · Russell
179 Ga. 354; 175 S.E. 909; 1934 Ga. LEXIS 288

Brown v. Tom Huston Corp.

Opinion of the Court

Russell, C. J.

Under the pleadings and the evidence the court did not err in granting an interlocutory injunction to prevent a sale of property under the power contained in the security deed, thus preserving the status pending the trial upon the issues involved. The record does not show sufficient cause for the appointment of a receiver.

Judgment affirmed m pari and reversed in part.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, J., who dissents. O. L. Shepard, for plaintiffs in error. Hatcher & Hatcher and Felton & Felton, contra.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.