Golden v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia November 17, 1934

Golden v. State, 179 Ga. 767 (Ga. 1934)

177 S.E. 511; 1934 Ga. LEXIS 400

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to support the verdict. There is no merit in the special grounds of the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices cononr, except Russell, G. J., and Sutcheson, J., who dissent. '■ M. J. Yeomans, allorney-general, W. O. Forehand, solicitor-geneneral, B. D. Murphy and J. T. Goree, assistant attorneys-general, Philip Newbern, and Levy Rogers, contra.

Reference

Status: Published