Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935

Bradham v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided January 19, 1935 · Bell

180 Ga. 187; 178 S.E. 445; 1935 Ga. LEXIS 214

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Savannah News-Press, Inc. v. Hartridge (Ga. Ct. App. 1964)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

1. The evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to warrant the charge on the subject of conspiracy, and to authorize the verdict of guilty.

2. The grounds'of the motion for a new trial relating to other questions, not being referred to in the briefs for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

3. The judgment refusing a new trial was not erroneous for any reason urged.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices ooneur, except Russell, C. J., and Atkinson, J., who dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.