Bradham v. State
Bradham v. State
180 Ga. 187; 178 S.E. 445; 1935 Ga. LEXIS 214
Bradham v. State
Opinion of the Court
1. The evidence, though circumstantial, was sufficient to warrant the charge on the subject of conspiracy, and to authorize the verdict of guilty.
2. The grounds'of the motion for a new trial relating to other questions, not being referred to in the briefs for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.
3. The judgment refusing a new trial was not erroneous for any reason urged.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.