Whiteman v. Federal Land Bank
Whiteman v. Federal Land Bank
182 Ga. 725; 186 S.E. 726; 1936 Ga. LEXIS 550
Whiteman v. Federal Land Bank
070rehearing
On rehearing, Atkinson, Justice, dissents from the original opinion, because the court erred in allowing the Federal Land Bank of Columbia to intervene, over the objection that the bank was a third party and could not intervene in the action at law.
Opinion of the Court
This case is controlled by the ruling in Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Blackshear Bank, 182 Ga. 657, which requires an affirmance of the judgment of the court below.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.