Avery v. Samuels
Avery v. Samuels
Opinion of the Court
1. The equity in the petition, if any, consisted in an allegation that the defendants had in their possession the identical money of which the plaintiff was defrauded; and secondly, that a third party, the custodian of the money, would, unless enjoined, deliver the same to other persons, in a certain contingency. The proof failed to support either allegation.
3. It follows that the verdict is without evidence to support it. The. judgment refusing a new trial must be
Reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.