Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938

Rosser v. Lam Amusement Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided March 10, 1938 · Atkinson

185 Ga. 725; 196 S.E. 404; 1938 Ga. LEXIS 500

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Waller v. Lanier (Ga. 1944)
Forehand v. Moody (Ga. 1945)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

The allegations of the petition as set forth in the accompanying statement of facts, show a cause of action for injunctive relief. Rose Theater v. Lilly, 185 Ga. 53 (193 S. E. 866); Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co., 185 Ga. 379 (195 S. E. 156). The judge erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition and dismissing the action. See Thompson v. Atlanta, 178 Ga. 281 (2) (172 S. E. 915).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Maddox, Matthews & Owens, for plaintiff. Lanham & Parker and Wright & Covington, for defendant.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.