Rosser v. Lam Amusement Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia
Rosser v. Lam Amusement Co., 185 Ga. 725 (Ga. 1938)
196 S.E. 404; 1938 Ga. LEXIS 500
Atkinson

Rosser v. Lam Amusement Co.

Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

The allegations of the petition as set forth in the accompanying statement of facts, show a cause of action for injunctive relief. Rose Theater v. Lilly, 185 Ga. 53 (193 S. E. 866); Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co., 185 Ga. 379 (195 S. E. 156). The judge erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition and dismissing the action. See Thompson v. Atlanta, 178 Ga. 281 (2) (172 S. E. 915).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Maddox, Matthews & Owens, for plaintiff. Lanham & Parker and Wright & Covington, for defendant.

Reference

Full Case Name
Rosser, solicitor-general v. Lam Amusement Co.
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published