Rosser v. Lam Amusement Co.
Rosser v. Lam Amusement Co.
185 Ga. 725; 196 S.E. 404; 1938 Ga. LEXIS 500
Rosser v. Lam Amusement Co.
Opinion of the Court
The allegations of the petition as set forth in the accompanying statement of facts, show a cause of action for injunctive relief. Rose Theater v. Lilly, 185 Ga. 53 (193 S. E. 866); Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co., 185 Ga. 379 (195 S. E. 156). The judge erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition and dismissing the action. See Thompson v. Atlanta, 178 Ga. 281 (2) (172 S. E. 915).
Judgment reversed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.