Rosser v. Lam Amusement Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Rosser v. Lam Amusement Co., 185 Ga. 725 (Ga. 1938)
196 S.E. 404; 1938 Ga. LEXIS 500
Atkinson
Rosser v. Lam Amusement Co.
Opinion of the Court
The allegations of the petition as set forth in the accompanying statement of facts, show a cause of action for injunctive relief. Rose Theater v. Lilly, 185 Ga. 53 (193 S. E. 866); Atkinson v. Lam Amusement Co., 185 Ga. 379 (195 S. E. 156). The judge erred in sustaining the demurrer to the petition and dismissing the action. See Thompson v. Atlanta, 178 Ga. 281 (2) (172 S. E. 915).
Judgment reversed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Rosser, solicitor-general v. Lam Amusement Co.
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published