1. It was no valid objection to the introduction of a photograph of certain premises where a crime was alleged to have taken place, that the photograph was made on a date later than that on which, as alleged, the occurrence took place, where it appeared from the evi- - dence of a witness on whom the crime was charged to have been committed that the photograph correctly portrayed the place referred to.

'2 The evidence supported the verdict, which had the approval of the trial judge. Judgment affirmed.