Hendrix v. Pirkle

Supreme Court of Georgia
Hendrix v. Pirkle, 69 S.E.2d 267 (Ga. 1952)
208 Ga. 751; 1952 Ga. LEXIS 336
Atkinson

Hendrix v. Pirkle

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

“A demurrer to an original petition does not, without more, cover the petition after it has been amended in material respects, but in such case the demurrer should be renewed if it is still relied on.” Livingston v. Barnett, 193 Ga. 640 (19 S. E. 2d, 385); Hughes v. Purcell, 198 Ga. 666 (32 S. E. 2d, 392); Peoples Loan Co. v. Allen, 199 Ga. 537 (34 S. E. 2d, 811); Silverman v. Alday, 200 Ga. 711 (38 S. E. 2d, 419); Howard v. Lee, 208 Ga. 735. Accordingly, the present exceptions to the rulings on demurrer do not present any question for decision; and, no other questions being presented, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Reference

Cited By
10 cases
Status
Published