Supreme Court of Georgia, 1952

Hendrix v. Pirkle

Hendrix v. Pirkle
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided February 13, 1952 · Atkinson
69 S.E.2d 267; 208 Ga. 751; 1952 Ga. LEXIS 336 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Hendrix v. Pirkle

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

“A demurrer to an original petition does not, without more, cover the petition after it has been amended in material respects, but in such case the demurrer should be renewed if it is still relied on.” Livingston v. Barnett, 193 Ga. 640 (19 S. E. 2d, 385); Hughes v. Purcell, 198 Ga. 666 (32 S. E. 2d, 392); Peoples Loan Co. v. Allen, 199 Ga. 537 (34 S. E. 2d, 811); Silverman v. Alday, 200 Ga. 711 (38 S. E. 2d, 419); Howard v. Lee, 208 Ga. 735. Accordingly, the present exceptions to the rulings on demurrer do not present any question for decision; and, no other questions being presented, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.