Gaulding v. Courts
Gaulding v. Courts
Opinion of the Court
The allegations and prayers of the petition and cross-action showing no grounds for equitable relief — the prayers being merely for judgment in stated amounts and the appointment of an auditor, and no complicated or intricate accounts being shown involving a trust fund as alleged — the case is one at law and not in equity, and the Court of Appeals and not the Supreme Court has jurisdiction of this writ of error. See Code § 37-301; Burress v. Montgomery, 148 Ga. 548 (97 S. E. 538); Arthur Tufts Co. v. DeJarnette Supply Co., 158 Ga. 85 (123 S. E. 16); Gormley v. Slicer, 178 Ga. 85 (172 S. E. 21); Universal Garage Co. v. Fowler, 184 Ga. 604 (192 S. E. 299); Henderson v. Curtis, 185 Ga. 390, 392 (195 S. E. 152).
Transferred to the Court of Appeals.
Reference
- Status
- Published