Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965

Hames v. Hames

Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided February 4, 1965 · No. 22756 · Qtjillian

220 Ga. 595; 140 S.E.2d 844; 1965 Ga. LEXIS 568

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Smith v. Merchants & Farmers Bank (Ga. 1970)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Qtjillian, Justice.

The only question presented by the assignment of error in the present case is whether the Act of 1941, as amended (Ga. L. 1941, pp. 487-489; Ga. L. 1953, Nov. Sess., pp. 313, 314), embodied in Code Ann. § 67-1308, is applicable to a note and security deed given to secure the same where the note matured before the Act, according to its provisions, became effective as a statute of the State. This precise question is answered in the negative in the case of Todd v. Morgan, 215 Ga. 220, 221 (2) (109 SE2d 803). The Todd case is controlling here.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Submitted January 11, 1965 Decided February 4, 1965. G. W. Langford, for plaintiff in error. Shaw, Stolz & Fletcher, contra.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.