Turner v. Harper
Cases that cite this one
98 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Cunningham v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 1974)
- David Ingle v. Jeffery Casey Joyner (Ga. Ct. App. 2026)
- Marcus Williams v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2025)
- Linda Scott Et L v. Oaks at Conyers LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2025)
- Riley Hadfield v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2024)
- Tara Anna, LLC v. Freihofer Transport, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 2024)
- Viren Patel v. Miguel Lopez (Ga. Ct. App. 2023)
- Richard Wayne Morris Jr. v. MacI Leigh Morris (Ga. Ct. App. 2019)
- Nicole Lynette-Zerbel Ivers v. John Thomas Ivers (Ga. Ct. App. 2016)
- Rebecca Kitchens v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2013)
- Bryan Devine v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2012)
- Turner v. Harper (Ga. 1975)
- Laurens County v. Dixon (Ga. Ct. App. 1975)
- Traditions Health, LLC v. Lacey Brown (Ga. Ct. App. 2026)
- In re Estate of June White Purvis (Ga. Ct. App. 2026)
- Aamir Muhammad v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2025)
- IRONSIDE EAST ATLANTA, LLC v. IRONSIDE HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2025)
- Diane Marie Gnam v. Estate of James G. White (Ga. Ct. App. 2024)
- Lcs Financial Services Corporation v. Aline Stingley (Ga. Ct. App. 2024)
- Michael Vasser v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2024)
- JAMES CHAMBERS v. ORA CHAMBERS (Ga. Ct. App. 2024)
- Murry Mosely v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2023)
- Richard Ramierez Rios v. Barbara Elisa Barreto Santiago (Ga. Ct. App. 2023)
- Sean Foster v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2023)
- Julia Lavonne Fischel v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2023)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Dissenting Opinion
dissenting. I do not agree that this appeal should be dismissed simply because the certificate for immediate review was not filed with the clerk of the trial court within the ten-day period in which it was signed by the trial judge. As I understand Code Ann. § 6-701 (a 2), it is only required that the certificate be obtained from the trial judge within ten days of entry of such order, decision, or judgment complained of. When such certificate is obtained within that ten-day period, as was done here, the party wishing to appeal has complied with the requirements of this Code section, and it is not fatal to the appeal that such a certificate is not filed with the clerk of the trial court within the same ten-day period.
In my opinion, a certificate for immediate review merely allowing an appeal from a non-final judgment is not such a judgment as is contemplated by Code Ann. § 6-903. See Jordan v. State, 129 Ga. App. 176 (198 SE2d 888).
I therefore respectfully dissent from the judgment of dismissal.
I am authorized to state that Chief Justice Mobley and Justice Ingram concur in this dissent.
Opinion of the Court
This case began as an action for specific
The appellants sought and obtained from the trial judge a certificate for immediate review. This certificate is dated March 23,1973, well within the ten-day period required by statute, but this certificate or order was not filed with the clerk or "entered” until April 6, 1973, well beyond the ten-day period required by statute.
It is clear that the judgments entered in the trial court are not final or appealable judgments without a certificate for immediate review. Such a certificate must be obtained within a ten-day period from the entry of the judgment or judgments sought to be appealed. Code Ann. § 6-701 (a 2).
Code Ann. § 6-903 provides that the filing with the clerk of a judgment, signed by the judge, constitutes the "entry” of the judgment within the meaning of the Appellate Practice Act.
We therefore have a question of first impression. Does the dating of a certificate within the ten-day period authorize an appeal by "certificate for immediate review,” or must the certificate be filed with the clerk of the trial court or "entered” within the ten-day period?
We hold that the certificate must be filed with the clerk of the trial court or "entered” within the ten-day period in order to secure immediate review of a non-final judgment; and if the certificate is not entered within the ten-day period, then the party seeking review will merely have to await a final judgment in the case before he can obtain review of interlocutory judgments entered in the trial court.
Therefore, in this case the judgments sought to be appealed were not appealable judgments.
Appeal dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.