Exchange Bank v. Hill
Exchange Bank v. Hill
Opinion of the Court
Exchange Bank appeals from an order refusing to dissolve a temporary restraining order, and granting temporary injunction.
George W. and Lucille Hill sought to restrain the foreclosure of their deed to secure debt which secured an indebtedness to the hank. They alleged that: At the time of making the loan they paid the bank the premium to
The trial judge restrained the foreclosure sale. The bank made a motion for order to dissolve the temporary restraining order. After hearing evidence, the judge denied the motion to dissolve the restraining order and granted temporary injunction.
We have considered the evidence submitted at the hearing and have determined that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in entering the order appealed from, and there is no merit in the enumeration of errors by the bank.
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.