Supreme Court of Georgia, 1978

Davis v. Davis

Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided October 4, 1978 · Marshall, Hall, Hill

249 S.E.2d 90; 242 Ga. 322; 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1191 (South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

Trinity Inspections, LLC v. Hancock Roofing & Construction, LLC D/B/A Hancock Claims Consultants (Ga. Ct. App. 2016)
KRISTA RENEE CORDOVA v. AMY DAVIS (Ga. Ct. App. 2021)
Shelly Namdar-Yeganeh v. Cyndi Namdar-Yeganeh (Ga. Ct. App. 2020)
Cicely Mitchell v. Travis Grant, III (Ga. Ct. App. 2019)
Melissa Kay Smith v. John Blake Pearce (Ga. Ct. App. 2013)
In the Interest Of: J. J. C., a Child (Father) v. in the Interest Of: J. J. C., a Child (Mother) (Ga. Ct. App. 2012)
Ivey v. Bicknell (Ga. Ct. App. 2008)
Atlanta Hanggliders & Ultralights, Inc. v. Rountree (Ga. Ct. App. 1984)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Marshall, Justice.

The defendant husband appeals from two orders of the trial court. The order granting temporary alimony, though appealable under Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) (3) (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1968, pp. 1072,1073; 1975, pp. 757, 758), has been abandoned by failure to either enumerate it as error or argue it. The order denying the appellant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is an interlocutory order, which is not appealable without a certificate of immediate review. Code Ann. § 6-701, supra, (a) 2 (A) and (B); Kristensen v. Kristensen, 238 Ga. 294 (232 SE2d 564) (1977). Therefore, the appellee wife’s motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted.

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Hall and Hill, JJ., who dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.