Brazo v. Cox
Brazo v. Cox
307 S.E.2d 474; 251 Ga. 491
(South Eastern Reporter, Second Series)
Brazo v. Cox
Opinion
BRAZO
v.
COX.
KRYSTAL COMPANY
v.
COX.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Kelly, Denney, Pease & Allison, John W. Denney, Miller P. Robinson, for appellant (case no. 39877).
Hatcher, Stubbs, Land, Hollis & Rothschild, Robert C. Martin, Jr., James E. Humes II, for appellant (case no. 39878).
Peter G. Williams, for appellee.
W. Lyman Dillon, Gary P. Bunch, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
After plenary consideration of this matter, we find that Division 1 of the opinion of the Court of Appeals and the judgment rendered thereon, Cox v. Brazo, 165 Ga. App. 888 (1) (303 SE2d 71) (1983), are correct and should be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur, except Marshall, P. J., and Clarke, J., who dissent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.