Quigley v. Woodall

Supreme Court of Georgia January 7, 1985

Quigley v. Woodall, 253 Ga. 688 (Ga. 1985)

325 S.E.2d 772; 1985 Ga. LEXIS 522

Hill

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam.

Judgment affirmed without opinion pursuant to Rule 59 of this court.

All the Justices concur, except Hill, C. J., who concurs specially and Smith, J., not participating. Henning, Chambers & Mabry, Walter B. McClelland, Richard W. Wilson, Jr., for appellants. Hurt, Richardson, Garner, Todd & Cadenhead, James H. Cox, James R. Harland, Jr., Franklin N. Biggins, for appellees.

Concurring Opinion

Hill, Chief Justice,

concurring specially.

I write simply to point out that, in my view, when neighbors of rezoned property seek to show that the rezoning power is being manifestly abused to the oppression of the neighbors, see Cross v. Hall County, 238 Ga. 709, 711 (235 SE2d 379) (1977), they must do so by objective evidence, not the subjective intent of the county commissioners, and hence the taking of the depositions of the county commissioners is unnecessary.

Reference

Full Case Name: QUIGLEY v. WOODALL
Cited By: 2 cases
Status: Published