Dallas Blue Haven Pools, Inc. v. Taslimi
Cases that cite this one
12 later published cases cite this decision.
- Zampatti v. TRADEBANK INTERN. FRANCHISING (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)
- Zampatti v. Tradebank International Franchising Corp. (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)
- Mcintyre v. Pope (Ga. Ct. App. 1994)
- Thomas v. Schouten (Ga. Ct. App. 1993)
- Dominiak v. Camden Telephone & Telegraph Co. (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
- Southern International Pictures, Inc. v. Friedman (Ga. Ct. App. 1991)
- Montgomery v. City of Sylvania (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
- Glen Restaurants, Inc. v. Building 5 Associates, Ltd. (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
- Wyse v. Potamkin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
- RICHMOND LEASING, INC. v. First Union Bank (Ga. Ct. App. 1988)
- McKenzie v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)
- Whisenaut v. Gray (Ga. Ct. App. 1987)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
We granted certiorari to examine the holding of the Court of Appeals in Dallas Blue Haven Pools v. Taslimi, 180 Ga. App. 734 (350 *740 SE2d 265) (1986), that Rule 6.3 of the Uniform Superior Court Rules (253 Ga. 801, 817) is not inconsistent with OCGA § 9-11-56 (c), and that, under each or all of three stated bases, it was not error for the trial court to grant a summary judgment in accordance with Rule 6.3 without an oral-argument hearing, where neither party requested such a hearing. This case is controlled by Kelley v. First Franklin Financial Corp., 256 Ga. 622 (351 SE2d 443) (1987).
Judgment affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.