A jury convicted Eric Maurice Taylor of malice murder in the shooting death of Timothy Kitts. 1 Taylor appeals, contending that several jury charges were erroneous. Because there is no reversible error in the charges viewed as a whole, we affirm.

The evidence at trial showed that Taylor and Kitts were friends, but that Taylor was angry at Kitts for borrowing his bicycle without permission and for not returning it. Kitts was unarmed when Taylor, carrying a revolver, approached him on the street. Taylor was waving the gun around as the two exchanged angry words. When Kitts turned to leave, Taylor fired the gun at the back of his head.

1. After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found Taylor guilty of the crimes charged. 2

2. Taylor contends that the trial court’s charge on voluntary manslaughter violated the rule of Edge v. State. 3 However, the jury convicted Taylor of malice murder as well as of felony murder and he was sentenced on the malice murder count. This Court has previously held that there can be no harmful Edge violation when the jury convicts on a malice murder charge. 4

3. The trial court did not err in not giving a charge on involuntary manslaughter because the evidence did not support that charge. 5

4. Taylor requested that the trial court give the statutory definition of a crime that references “criminal negligence.” Because Taylor *498 requested the instruction, he cannot assert it as error. 6 Additionally, the charge as a whole correctly instructed the jury that they could find Taylor guilty of malice murder only if they found beyond a reasonable doubt that he acted with an unlawful intention to kill without justification, excuse or mitigation.

Judgment affirmed.