Moon v. Moon

Supreme Court of Georgia November 15, 1999

Moon v. Moon, 271 Ga. 685 (Ga. 1999)

524 S.E.2d 219; 1999 Ga. LEXIS 964

Carley

Opinion of the Court

Carley, Justice,

dissenting.

Because the record clearly shows that parental fitness was not a contested issue below, this case is ripe for decision. I therefore dissent to the majority’s remand for the purpose of addressing the previously unchallenged issue of parental fitness.

*686Decided November 15, 1999. Howard G. Sokol, Vicky O. Kimbrell, Phyllis J. Holmen, Lisa J. Krisher, for appellant. Martin L. Fierman, Alan W. Thrower, Kutner & Bloom, Jean M. Kutner, for appellees. David A. Webster, Bondurant, Mixson & Elmore, Lynn M. Adam, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, William C. Joy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, ShalenA. Sgrosso, Assistant Attorney General, amici curiae.

Reference

Full Case Name: MOON v. MOON
Status: Published