Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003

In re Cunningham

In re Cunningham
Supreme Court of Georgia · Decided March 27, 2003
276 Ga. 400; 578 S.E.2d 892; 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1110; 2003 Ga. LEXIS 314

In re Cunningham

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Respondent R. Scott Cunningham’s Petition for Voluntary Discipline, which was filed under Bar Rule 4-227 (b) (2) before a formal complaint was issued. In his petition, Cunningham admits violating Rule 1.15 (II) (b) of the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in Bar Rule 4-102 (d). Although a violation of this rule is punishable by disbarment, Cunningham requests the imposition of a twelve-month suspension. The State Bar has no objection to the acceptance of Cunningham’s petition.

Cunningham, who has been a member of the Bar since 1976, admits that during a period of time from November 2000 to June 2001, while holding $2,000 belonging to a client in his attorney trust account, he commingled client funds with his personal funds and permitted the balance of the account to fall below $2,000. Although Cunningham ultimately returned the $2,000 to his client, he admits his conduct violated Rule 1.15 (II) (b) and that, as a result, he is subject to disbarment. In mitigation of his actions Cunningham points out that he has cooperated fully with disciplinary authorities, although we note that he previously received a public reprimand in a prior disciplinary matter in 1993. Under the circumstances, however, we agree with the State Bar that a twelve-month suspension is the appropriate sanction. Accordingly, Cunningham is hereby suspended for a period of twelve months. He is reminded of his duties under Bar Rule 4-219 (c).

Twelve-month suspension.

All the Justices concur. Laura R. Pardo, for Cunningham.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.