Camacho v. Estate of Pangelinan

District Court, D. Guam
Camacho v. Estate of Pangelinan, 1 Guam 406 (1970)
Abbate, Goodwin, Guam, Island

Camacho v. Estate of Pangelinan

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM

The decision of the lower court is affirmed.

There is adequate support in the record for the Court’s conclusion that the petitioner’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations.

In prosecuting this stale claim, the petitioner has demonstrated the reason for the application of the statute of limitations. The record in the lower court is filled with *407contentions that are so remote as to time that it is difficult to find them credible. Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
PEDRO OGO CAMACHO v. In the Matter of the Estate of MAGDALENA F. PANGELINAN
Status
Published