Superior Court of Guam, 1976

Siongco v. Guam Development & Investment Corp.

Siongco v. Guam Development & Investment Corp.
Superior Court of Guam · Decided October 26, 1976 · Benson
1 Guam 355

Counsel

Counsel for Plaintiff: J. C. Dierking, Counsel for Inland Builders, Inc. and Commercial Insurance of Newark, New Jersey: Crain & Shoecraft, Co-Counsel for Inland'i Builders and Eulogio Del Carmeo: Fred Bordallo, Representing Government of Guam: Cyril E. Morrison

Siongco v. Guam Development & Investment Corp.

Opinion of the Court

BENSON, Judge

ORDER

IN ORDER that the trial proceed in an orderly manner,

IT IS ORDERED:

1. That the parties present for marking every exhibit that they intend to offer in evidence at 3:30 p.m., December 17,1976.

2. That at the time and date stated above the parties will exchange lists of every witness each intends to call together with a concise statement of the expected testimony of each witness.

No exhibit not marked and no witness not listed as required by this order shall be offered or called at the trial, except for good cause shown. (Jury trial remains December 21, 1976 at 9:30 a.m.).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.