In re NK
In re NK
Opinion
LAW L|BFZAFIY NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
No. 30334 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS _ § co oF THE STATE oF HAWA:‘I z "" r"~;" In the Interest of NK iv ig s 55 APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CI "~3` <Fc-s No. 07-11432) ' ,§ ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL PURSUANT TO HRAP RULE 30 (By: Nakamura, C.J., Foley and Fujise, JJ.) (l) on Upon review of the record, it appears that: February 10, 20lO, Father-Appellant (Appellant) filed a notice of appeal; (2) on March 22, 20lO, the appellate clerk filed a notice of entering case on calendar and notified Appellant the 2010 and the jurisdictional statement was due on March 27, (3) Appellant filed the opening brief was due on April 2l, 2010; jurisdictional statement, but he did not file the opening brief; (4) on June l7, 20lO, the appellate clerk informed Appellant (b) the matter (a) the time for filing the opening brief expired; would be called to the attention of the court on June 24, 2010 for such action as the court deemed proper; and (c) the appeal may be dismissed pursuant to HawaFi Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 30; and (5) Appellant did not file the required document or seek relief from default. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed pursuant to HRAP Rule 30.
DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUH AU9USt 41 20l0~ fit ¢/(.%Q,,\ Chief Judge cé,;jvz'” Associate Judge Assoc1ate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.