Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2010

Cross v. Harden

Cross v. Harden
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Decided June 3, 2010

Cross v. Harden

Opinion

LAW L|BHAF<Y NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER NO. 30208 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE oF HAWAI‘I‘ DUSTIN CROSS and SANDI ADELE SCHNEIDERMAN, Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellees, V. THERESA ILENE HARDEN, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff-Appellan and

JOHN DOES 1-lO; et al, Defendants.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. O8~l-O263) ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL PURSUANT TO HRAP RULE 30 (By: Nakamura, C.J., Fujise and Leonard, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that: (l) on December l, 2009, Defendant-Appellant Theresa Ilene Harden (Appellant) filed a notice of appeal; (2) on February l, 20lO, the appellate clerk filed a notice of entering case on calendar and notified Appellant the statement of jurisdiction was due on February ll, 20lO, and the opening brief was due on March l3, 20lO; (3) Appellant filed the statement of jurisdiction on February 11, 20lO; (4) Appellant obtained an extension of time until April l4, 2010 to file the opening brief, but she did not file the opening brief by that date; (5) on April 22, 2010, the appellate clerk informed Appellant: (a) the time to file the opening brief expired; (b) the matter would be called to the attention of the court on April 29, 2010 for such action as the court deemed proper; and (c) the appeal may be dismissed pursuant NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI‘I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER to HRAP Rule 30; and (6) Appellant did not file the opening brief or seek relief from default. Therefore, IT is HEREBY QRDERED that the appeal is dismissed pursuant to HRAP Rule 30. ` DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq JUne 31 20l0~ &g@f_%eawi, Chief Judge

Associate Judge l A soc1ate dge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.