Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2020

Remax Properties v. Young

Remax Properties v. Young
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Decided April 6, 2020

Remax Properties v. Young

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 06-APR-2020 09:22 AM NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

REMAX PROPERTIES, authorized agent for RICHARD K. TAHARA and MARJORIE T. TAHARA, owners of the subject property, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHRISTOPHER YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT PUNA DIVISION (CIVIL NO. 3RC-18-1-1186)

ORDER DISMISSING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Chan and Hiraoka, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the document, filed March 12, 2020, by self-represented Defendant-Appellant Christopher Young (Young), which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration of the February 28, 2020 order dismissing appeal (Motion), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that (1) on February 28, 2020, the court dismissed the appeal for failure to file the statement of jurisdiction and opening brief; (2) in the instant Motion, Young seeks reconsideration of the February 28, 2020 order; (3) a motion for reconsideration of the February 28, 2020 order was due on or before March 9, 2020. See Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a); and (4) the NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER instant Motion, filed March 12, 2020, is untimely as a motion for reconsideration.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is dismissed as untimely.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 6, 2020.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.