Skahan v. Stutts Construction Company
Skahan v. Stutts Construction Company
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 21-APR-2020 08:27 AM
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
KENNETH M. SKAHAN, Claimant-Appellant, v. STUTTS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LTD., Employer-Appellee, and FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY OF HAWAII, LTD., Insurance Carrier-Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD (CASE NO.: AB 2014-041 (WH); DCD NO.: 9-13-45106(M))
ORDER DENYING THE APRIL 13, 2020 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DISMISSING THE APRIL 14, 2020 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Leonard and Wadsworth, JJ.)
Upon consideration of "Appellant's Motion for Reconsideration of the April 1, 2020 Summary Disposition Order", filed on April 13, 2020, and a similar motion filed on April 14, 2020, by self-represented Claimant-Appellant Kenneth M. Skahan (Skahan), the papers in support, and the record, it appears that: (1) In the April 13, 2020 motion, Skahan seeks reconsideration of the court’s April 1, 2020 Summary Disposition Order, but fails to raise any point of law or fact overlooked or misapprehended in the Summary Disposition Order. See Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 40(b).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
(2) The April 14, 2020 motion is untimely under HRAP Rule 40(a).
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the April 13, 2020 motion is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the April 14, 2020 motion is dismissed as untimely.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 21, 2020.
/S/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.