Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2020

RSM Inc. v. Middleton

RSM Inc. v. Middleton
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Decided June 5, 2020

RSM Inc. v. Middleton

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 05-JUN-2020 09:40 AM NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I RSM INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WILLIAM MIDDLETON AND TATIANA MIDDLETON, Defendants-Appellants

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (NORTH AND SOUTH HILO DIVISION) (CASE NO. 3RC 17-1-000320) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Chan and Wadsworth, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the June 1, 2020 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Dismissing Appeal dated May 19, 2020, by Defendants-Appellants William Middleton and Tatiana Middleton (Appellants), self-represented, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that the motion for reconsideration was due by May 29, 2020, and therefore is untimely. See Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a).

Moreover, Appellants' motion for reconsideration does not establish that the court overlooked or misapprehended any points of law or fact in its May 19, 2020 dismissal order.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is dismissed as untimely.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 5, 2020.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Derrick H.M. Chan Associate Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.