Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2021

U.S. Bank National Association v. Moxley

U.S. Bank National Association v. Moxley
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Decided May 27, 2021

U.S. Bank National Association v. Moxley

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 27-MAY-2021 08:44 AM NO. CAAP-21-0000084Dkt. 52 ODMR

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHALF OF THE HOLDERS OF WASHINGTON MUTUAL ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, WMABS, SERIES 2006-HE1, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAN MOXLEY, Defendant-Appellant, and CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A.; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; Defendants-Appellees, and DOES 1 through 20, Inclusive, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 3CC171000292) ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Ginoza, Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Nakasone, JJ.)

Upon consideration of self-represented Defendant- Appellant Jan Moxley's (Moxley) May 25, 2021 motion for reconsideration of the court's May 13, 2021 Order Granting Motion To Dismiss Appeal, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that the motion for reconsideration is untimely, and in any event, the court did not overlook or misapprehend any point of law or fact when it entered the May 13, 2021 order. See Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rules 40(a) and (b).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, May 27, 2021.

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.