Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2024

Choi v. Korean Christian Church

Choi v. Korean Christian Church
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Decided October 11, 2024

Choi v. Korean Christian Church

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 11-OCT-2024 08:30 AM Dkt. 94 OGMD NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

HYE JA CHOI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KOREAN CHRISTIAN CHURCH; REX KIM; IRIS KIM; DANIEL CHANG; DIANA CHANG; ANNA KIM; JOSEPH KIM; SONG K. (KUN) CHOI; KRIS CHOO; MI KYEONG KIM; SUN YOUNG KIM; NAOMI LIM; HUNG JA KWAK; SUNG OK KIM; ESTHER KWON; SYLVIA GILLESPIE; JIN YU; SERA SUNG; MYOUNG STEMPIN; SOO JIN CHIKASUYE; YOUNG AE HAN; HANNAH CHANG, Defendants-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Defendants-Appellees Korean Christian Church and Rex Kim's (together, Appellees) September 27, 2024 Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Lack of Jurisdiction, the papers in support and in opposition, and the record, it appears that Appellees seek dismissal of the appeal filed by self-represented Plaintiff-Appellant Hye Ja Choi from the Circuit Court of the First Circuit's March 22, 2024 Order Granting [Appellees'] Motion for Summary Judgment and for Judgment on the Pleadings [Dkt. 251] (March 22, 2024 Order) on the basis that the court lacks appellate jurisdiction.

The record reflects that the Circuit Court has not entered a final, appealable decree, order, or judgment. Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 641-1(a) (2016); Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rules 58, 54(b); Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, 76 Hawai i 115, 119, 869 P.2d 1334, 1338 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER (1994). Though the March 22, 2024 Order could be certified for appeal in an HRCP Rule 54(b) judgment, the Circuit Court has not entered such a judgment or expressed any intent to do so. Further, the March 22, 2024 Order is not independently appealable under the collateral-order or Forgay 1 doctrines, and the Circuit Court has not granted leave for an interlocutory appeal under HRS § 641-1(b). See Greer v. Baker, 137 Hawai i 249, 253, 369 P.3d 832, 836 (2016) (setting forth the requirements for appealability under the collateral-order doctrine and the Forgay doctrine); HRS § 641-1(b) (specifying requirements for leave to file interlocutory appeal).

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellees' motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, October 11, 2024.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge

Forgay v. Conrad, 47 U.S. 201 (1848).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.