Central Pacific Bank v. Ayson
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 07-MAR-2024 08:17 AM Dkt. 22 ODMR NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
CENTRAL PACIFIC BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FERDINAND CARREON AYSON and VICTORIA ESPRECION AYSON, Defendants-Appellants, and FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK; PENTAGON FEDERAL C.U.; CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) N.A.; VIVINT SOLAR, INC.; EWA BY GENTRY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION; VIVINT SOLAR DEVELOPER, LLC, Defendants-Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-20; JANE DOES 1-20; DOE CORPORATIONS 1-20; DOE ENTITIES 1-20; and DOE GOVERNMENTAL UNITS 1-20, Defendants
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CIVIL NO. 1CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Hiraoka, Presiding Judge, Nakasone and McCullen, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the Second Motion for Order (Second Motion), filed March 4, 2024, by self-represented Defendants-Appellants Ferdinand Carreon Ayson and Victoria Esprecion Ayson (collectively, Aysons), which the court construes as a motion for reconsideration, the papers in support, and the record, it appears that the Aysons seek reconsideration of the court's February 26, 2024 Order Denying Motion for Stay, but the Aysons fail to demonstrate that the court overlooked or misapprehended any point of law or fact. See Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(b).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Second Motion is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, March 7, 2024.
/s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Presiding Judge /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.