Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals, 2026

A.M. v. C.C.

A.M. v. C.C.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · Decided March 11, 2026
A.M. v. C.C.

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 11-MAR-2026 09:29 AM Dkt. 17 ODSD

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

A.M., Petitioner-Appellant, v. C.C. and CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondents-Appellees. (CASE NO. 3FPA-XX-XXXXXXX) AND C.C., Petitioner-Appellee, v. A.M., Respondent-Appellant, and CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent-Appellee. (CASE NO. 3FPA-XX-XXXXXXX)

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Guidry, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that: (1) The opening brief was due on or before December 1, 2025; NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(2) Self-represented Petitioner/Respondent-Appellant A.M. failed to file the opening brief or request an extension of time; (3) On December 23, 2025, the appellate clerk entered a default notice informing A.M. that the time for filing the opening brief had expired, the matter would be called to the court's attention on January 1, 2026, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of the appeal, under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 30, and A.M. could request relief from default by motion; and (4) A.M. has not taken any further action in this appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, March 11, 2026.

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Kimberly T. Guidry Associate Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.