Psak v. Kardash
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 09-APR-2026 08:41 AM Dkt. 90 ODMR
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
JERRE PSAK, Petitioner-Appellee, v. KEITH KARDASH, Respondent-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT HONOLULU DIVISION (CIVIL NO. 1DSS-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Leonard, Presiding Judge, Hiraoka and McCullen, JJ.)
Upon consideration of self-represented Respondent- Appellant Keith Kardash's March 31, 2026 "Motion to Vacate Summary Disposition Order Dated March 31, 2026 for Being Premature and Motion to Consolidate this Case with Keith Kardash v. Jerre Psak, Case No. CAAP-24-00000315," which the court construes as a motion for consolidation and for reconsideration under Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40, the papers in support, and the records in case numbers CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAIʻI REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, it appears that Kardash fails to demonstrate a point of law or fact that the court overlooked or misapprehended in the March 31, 2026 summary disposition order.
IT IS ORDERED that the motion is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all other pending motions are dismissed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, April 9, 2026.
/s/ Katherine G. Leonard Presiding Judge /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Associate Judge /s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen Associate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.