Psak v. Kardash
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 22-JUN-2026 09:07 AM Dkt. 7 ODSLJ
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I
JERRE PSAK, Petitioner-Appellee, v. KEITH KARDASH, Respondent-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT HONOLULU DIVISION (CASE NO. 1DSS-XX-XXXXXXX)
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL FOR LACK OF APPELLATE JURISDICTION (By: Nakasone, Chief Judge, Wadsworth and Gluck, JJ.)
Upon review of the record, it appears as follows: (1) On April 2, 2026, self-represented Respondent- Appellant Keith Kardash (Kardash) appealed from the November 1, 2023 First Amended Injunction Against Harassment, entered in the District Court of the First Circuit, Honolulu Division; (2) Kardash filed the Notice of Appeal more than 30 days after entry of the First Amended Injunction Against Harassment, which is outside of the deadline set forth in Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 4(a)(1); (3) The record does not indicate that Kardash received an extension of time to appeal under HRAP Rule 4(a)(4), or that the deadline was otherwise tolled by a timely-filed post-judgment motion under HRAP Rule 4(a)(3); and NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER (4) Compliance with the requirement of timely filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Grattafiori v. State, 79 Hawai i 10, 13, 897 P.2d 937, 940 (1995).
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are dismissed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, June 22, 2026.
/s/ Karen T. Nakasone Chief Judge /s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth Associate Judge /s/ Daniel M. Gluck Associate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.